The most frequent Faults in SEO Competitions

I've. I have gone through all of the phases: aspirant, Chosen, finalist, winner and even member of this jury on several occasions. And, believe me, watching SEO competitions from the other side removes many prejudices and anxieties.

If You're among people who believe that they never win Because SEO contests are given ahead, you're mistaken. Look at me, I don't have a plug everywhere and I've managed to win . SEO Contest uWelcome2019 In addition, I will guarantee you , in the juries I've participated in, the process was transparent, driven only by standards of SEO quality.

But you don't have to be naive either. Behind some of those However, there are still many others who are honest. Unfortunately, all these are also tough to win. Why? Since they're presented with professional writers. And by"professionals" I don't mean"celebrities. There are scores and scores of anonymous professional authors that are light years away from becoming multimillionaires, but who live off their art precisely because they triumph several search engine optimization prizes a year.

yourself. If you are a newcomer, how about starting with the regional SEO contests? Even prizes that are in their first editions and also the participation is not yet massive. Search engine optimization prizes from little cities are not usually badly compensated and are much cheaper. Or maybe you wish to try those where the prize is to be printed, so people will finally read for you. You will find SEO competitions of all types, as Víctorio Pajuo describes in this guide, and according to your objectives, you have to introduce yourself to others or some. It's going be SEO competitions... there's a lot of these every month!

BUT... before you start Considering the address of Gratitude, ask yourself if the story you present has a real prospect of winning, since I, who have been on the other hand performing the sifting, have observed errors that you would not believe. And I'm going to let you know about them so you do not fall to them. There they proceed.

ERRORS OF BULGE

1. Foundations

Carefully the rules, which are to get some thing. By simply complying with them to the letter, you've got a better prospect of winning than you believe. It's incredible how many people pass them . No expansion, no typeface, not the subject! They send anything they want and, ale, let us see if we're lucky! And no, of course there isn't. If a player doesn't bother to read the rules, the jury does not bother to read his text, which simple. That his story was good? Too bad, he delivered her to the wrong competition.

2. Not understanding the rules of Spelling and grammar

It Appears clear, but it's not: to win a SEO competition you Need to know how to write. Come on, the basics: putting letters together in line with the principles of grammar and combining words with meaning. Many, most, present stories full of flaws. Tildes? Comas? And because the jury is not there to decipher hieroglyphics, they're removed without contemplation.

When You're a jury and you've got more than fifty stories That do not comply with the rules and, moreover, are full of flaws, you do not know if to laugh or cry.

Between the unfulfilled bases and the flaws, a large part Of the participants are left out of the contest. Those who pass the first sieve belong to some minority. But that's when things become complicated...

STYLISTIC ERRORS

3. Not taking care of fashion

A good author is one who explains the complex with simple words. Whereas a terrible author, or inexperienced author, is one who tries to show off using a verbiage full of grandiloquent words. They reload the paragraphs in this way that it is all but impossible to understand what the story is about. I'm sorry to say that if you make that mistake and the jury should pick up a dictionary to follow you, they won't think you are too clever, they will think you're too pedantic and boring.

However, you don't have to go to the other extreme : Simple doesn't mean easy. A story that does not have these stylistic errors makes the difference. Therefore, one of the most essential measures before submitting your story to a search engine optimization contest is to spend a good deal of time adjusting your style, so the words that stay are just and essential.

STRUCTURAL ERRORS

4. The start is boring

There is a great deal of focus on the fact that the Opening sentence has to be especially excellent. I don't think that it's essential for a narrative to be outstanding, but it should not be anodyne either. And this error is particularly bleeding in a brief story or a micro story, in which every word counts. Too many.

Setting at a short story is generally a mistake. You likely hate it if your neighbor informs you about the weather in the elevator, especially when he warns you that it's raining when you wind up in suspenders and with your own umbrella beneath your arm. Well, the identical thing happens on your narrative: does it really matter that it was cloudy or the sun was shining? That type of information, in life and in literature, only interests us when it serves us well.

That information extends to books. Although there is more space For frills, it's advised that everything narrated should play a part in the narrative. The topical physical descriptions, the critique of all the protagonists' clothes, the section of the time in every chapter... sleep the reader and, do not doubt it, the jury of this search engine optimization competition.

5. A Lousy Improvement

Then there are the participants who have very internalized The first shocking phrase, however, they're not able to maintain the level during the rest of the text. You can see that they had a fantastic narrative, but they didn't know how to tell it. Too bad.

"sometimes the best thought is the way to tell the story. The most original debate in the world is useless if you don't elaborate the plot well. My recommendation is that you don't attempt to become a breaker when you have not mastered the fundamental tools yet. A normal well-told story will be more interesting to the jury than a very first one which is poorly developed. The jury is not likely to evaluate your good intentions, but the last result.

There are also those who believe that a Brief story is to Or the participants who recreate themselves in reflections with no story as a frequent thread. In all these scenarios, the issue is that they haven't understood that stories and micro stories have to have their own entity: they are not the younger brothers of a publication nor a couple of beautiful and deep phrases. They must tell a complete story in a few words, and that's where the complication is different.

6. Failed end

The terrible thing about a good start and a good development is That when the end is not up to the task, it disappoints. Only those who make the 3 components appealing can win the prize.

What mistakes do novice writers often make in the end of Their stories?

Explain the story: Yes, more than one does. That denotes Insecurity on the part of the author, who wishes to make it crystal clear that his story had a thickness that, perhaps, the jury has not been able to see. Now, the jury could respond in two ways: if they had known that the complexity of the narrative, they'll ask them to explain it to them, along with the participant will lose many points, if not all of them; and if they hadn't seen it for themselves (and, nevertheless, it's likely that they would have liked the best SEO contest uwelcome2019 story)they will realise that the author did not know how to transmit the ideas he had been trying to communicate... and they will also subtract points from it.

Conclusion: never clarify the end, make an attempt to be clear throughout the text. Or leave doors open for each reader to believe what they want, which is much more suggestive.

Recurring into the joke: You have to perform it very well To ensure it is funny. The dual meanings are very popular. What did it seem like you're speaking about your girlfriend, but you were referring to your car? Well, that's not surprising , in fact, it is possible to see it coming from afar. A story that is reduced to the last joke is easily forgotten, it won't ever remain in the mind of the prosecution, after dozens and dozens of stories .

Sentimentalism: Sometimes it works, however, from my point of View, a short story doesn't give time to produce the necessary atmosphere to Move with a final twist that touches the fiber. It is dangerous, if not If you opt for this type Of narrative, everything must be very quantified in order to not cause the reverse Result: rather than stirring, repelling.